Classifying consolidating software component selection methods
At the core of the paper, I propose a scheme to classify methods for empirical research consolidation followed by a review and classification of selected methods, illustrating the scheme. The classification scheme differentiates between two major attributes of methods—consolidation technique and type of content to be consolidated—that may reflect the positivist or constructivist research paradigm.Consolidation techniques could be aggregative, interpretive, or a combination thereof.wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Table 2 and/or 4 and wherein a decrease in expression or gene copy number of one or more biomarkers compared to the control is indicative the subject has invasive ADC.(c) treating the subject with chemotherapy or surgery when the subject has an increase in the expression level of one or more biomarkers from Table 3, a decreased expression of one or more biomarkers from Table 4, and/or an increase in the gene copy number of one or more biomarkers listed in Table 13. (1 April 2008) Expression Profile-Defined Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma Shows Close Relationship With Underlying Major Genetic Changes and Clinicopathologic Behaviors.I define research consolidation as comparing and combining (amalgamating or, at least, juxtaposing) results or other output from multiple previously conducted research activities, relevant to a goal or topic of interest.So, the air division purchases its own jet fuel, the trucking division purchases its own diesel, and the shipping freight division purchases its own oil.
A set of classification rules are specified, each such rule being associated with a classification category and said rule being adapted to analyze the state of the application and classify it by returning one or more classifications.wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Table 1 and/or 3, and wherein an increase in expression in one or more of the biomarkers is indicative the subject with lung adenocarcinoma has invasive ADC.wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Table 2 and/or 4 and wherein a decrease in expression of one or more of the one or more biomarkers is indicative the subject with lung adenocarcinomas has invasive ADC.(b) comparing the expression of the one or more biomarkers with a control, wherein a decrease in expression of the one or more biomarkers between the test sample and the one or more controls is indicative of poor survival.b) comparing the subject biomarker expression profile to one or more biomarker reference expression profiles associated with tumor progression, wherein the subject biomarker expression profile and the biomarker reference profile each has a plurality of values, each value representing the expression level of a biomarker, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Table 2 and/or 4, wherein similarity of the biomarker reference expression profile to the subject biomarker expression profile, predicts tumor progression for the subject.wherein a difference in the genomic profile between the one or more controls and the test sample is used to classify the subject as having BAC or invasive ADC and/or prognose the subject into a poor survival group or a good survival group wherein one of the one or more controls comprises a BAC or BAC with focal areas suspicious for invasion sample and wherein increased genomic alterations compared to the control, classifies the subject as having invasive ADC and/or prognoses the subject into the poor survival group.The company spends a fortune on fuel, and it's hired you, in part, to look for ways to cut costs.The problem is that, because of the diverse nature of your company's transportation methods (which cover air, ground, and ocean freight), each individual department purchases fuel separately.